India's New Criminal Codes: A Shift from Colonial to Constitutional Justice

6 min read • July 13, 2025

I Introduction:
A Historic Legal TransformationIn 2023, India undertook one of the most ambitious overhauls of its criminal justice system since independence. The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS), the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), and the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA) were enacted, replacing the colonial-era Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC), and the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (IEA), respectively.
This reform signals a departure from the legacy of British legal frameworks and promises a shift towards citizen-centric justice. Key goals include ensuring speedy trials, empowering victims, digitizing procedures, and strengthening national security.
II. Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023:
Redefining Substantive Criminal LawThe BNS contains 358 sections, a significant reduction from the 511 sections of the IPC. Outdated colonial terminology has been replaced with simplified and indigenous expressions. Notably:
Sedition Removed: Section 124A of the IPC, often criticized for curbing free speech, has been repealed. In its place, Clause 150 introduces the offence of acts endangering the sovereignty, unity, and integrity of India. This provision may face judicial scrutiny on grounds of vagueness. Mob Lynching and Organized Crime: These offences, which were previously not distinctly recognized, are now clearly defined. Clauses 103 and 111–113 address mob violence, organized crime, and terrorism with enhanced punishments.
Community Service: For the first time, the law introduces community service as an alternative punishment for minor offences, promoting restorative justice.
Hit-and-Run Accidents: The punishment has been enhanced significantly. BNS now prescribes up to 10 years' imprisonment for drivers who cause fatal accidents and flee the scene (Clause 104). Sexual Offences and Victim Rights: Provisions related to sexual offences have been redrafted for better clarity, including reference to digital sexual abuse. Importantly, Clause 193 codifies victim rights, including the right to legal assistance and to have their statements recorded promptly and sensitively.
III. Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023:
Overhauling Criminal ProcedureThe BNSS expands procedural law to 531 sections, incorporating modern technology and timelines to ensure effective justice delivery. Key innovations include:
Digital FIR and E-FIR: Citizens can now file FIRs electronically, including using digital signatures. The law formally recognizes e-FIRs and Zero FIRs under Clause 173, promoting easier access to justice. Timeline for Charge Sheets: Unlike the CrPC, which had no fixed deadline, BNSS mandates filing of charge sheets within 90 days, extendable up to 180 days, ensuring time-bound investigation.
Fast-Track Trials: BNSS directs that trials be completed within 2 years (Clause 258), addressing long-standing delays in the criminal justice process.Mandatory Forensic Involvement: In offences punishable with more than seven years, the presence of a forensic team is now compulsory, enhancing the quality of evidence.
Electronic Summons and Warrants: Service of summons and warrants through electronic modes is now recognized, reducing delays and paperwork.Video Conferencing and Bail Reforms: Accused persons may now be produced via video conferencing within 24 hours of arrest. These provisions echo the Supreme Court's directions in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar [(2014) 8 SCC 273].
Victim Protection Mechanisms: The BNSS ensures structured rights and protections for victims, including the right to information about the investigation and proceedings.
IV. Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023:
A Modern Evidence LawReplacing the Indian Evidence Act, the BSA comprises 170 sections, offering a technologically attuned and streamlined framework for handling evidence.
Digital and Electronic Evidence: Sections 61 to 66 give comprehensive recognition to digital records such as emails, SMS, CDRs, and blockchain entries. These updates reflect the constitutional principles upheld in Puttaswamy v. Union of India [(2017) 10 SCC 1], particularly regarding privacy and data authenticity. Equal Treatment of Oral and Documentary Evidence: The previous hierarchy between oral and documentary evidence is now replaced with an emphasis on authentication over form.
Presumptions and Relevancy: Presumptions under BSA are better aligned with contemporary realities, and the concept of relevancy has been revised to emphasize context and contemporaneity. Hostile Witness Provisions: The new law provides clearer mechanisms to address hostile witnesses, including compelling further testimony when necessary.
V. Challenges, Constitutional Concerns, and Judicial ReviewTransitional Challenges:
One pressing issue is the treatment of ongoing cases. Courts will need to clarify whether and how these cases will transition to the new codes or continue under the old laws.
Judicial Review of New Sedition Clause: The replacement of Section 124A IPC with Clause 150 BNS raises questions of constitutional validity, particularly in light of the Supreme Court's verdict in Shreya Singhal v. Union of India [(2015) 5 SCC 1], which emphasized the importance of protecting free speech.
Digital Divide: While digitization is a welcome step, its effectiveness depends on infrastructure, especially in rural areas. Adequate training for police and judiciary is vital to implement these provisions uniformly.
VI. Conclusion:
Towards a People-Centric Justice SystemThe 2023 criminal law reforms aim to align the justice system with constitutional principles, human rights, and modern technological needs. However, success will depend on effective implementation, capacity building, and judicial interpretation that upholds civil liberties. These reforms promise to transform criminal justice in India—from a colonial tool of control to a citizen-focused legal framework. The path forward must prioritize access to justice, due process, and the rule of law for every Indian citizen.

Written By Salil kumar
I am advocate salil kumar p, a lawyer practising in the district courts , Thalassery, for the past 27 years . Salil kumar p Advocate District court Thalassery -670101 Kannur District Kerala state