In modern educational discourse, the role of discipline in shaping a student's behavior and academic progress is frequently debated. One crucial legal and ethical question that emerges in this context is whether teachers in India, particularly in Kerala, possess the legal right to impose punishments for the betterment of students or whether such acts can amount to criminal offences. Recent judicial pronouncements by the Kerala High Court, especially by Justice A. Badharudeen and Justice P. V. Kunhikrishnan, have thrown much-needed light on this sensitive issue.
I. Judicial Endorsement of Reasonable Discipline, Justice A. Badharudeen's 2024 Rulings :-
Justice A. Badharudeen, in a series of rulings throughout 2024, upheld the legality of non-malicious disciplinary action by teachers, drawing a clear line between educational correction and punitive violence.
A) Jomi v. State of Kerala (July 3–4, 2024)In this case, a school principal was prosecuted under Section 324 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 82 of the Juvenile Justice Act for hitting a 13-year-old student who scored poorly in exams. The Court held that: The teacher's action was motivated by an academic objective, not malice. There was no grievous injury, nor long-term harm. Most importantly, schools were not classified as "child care institutions" under the JJ Act, rendering the charge under Section 82 inapplicable.
This case underscored that when intent is bona fide and non-injurious, reasonable disciplinary acts do not invite criminal liability.
B) Another 2024 Case (November 11, 2024)A 7th-standard student had verbally abused a teacher, prompting the latter to hit him lightly with a stick and pull his ear. Justice Badharudeen ruled that:
Minor physical reprimand, in the absence of serious harm or malice, does not attract juvenile justice provisions.
The teacher's conduct was reactive, not aggressive, and fell within the realm of permissible disciplinary response.
C) Clarification on July 5, 2024The Court emphasized that disciplinary punishment given for academic improvement or to instill behavior correction is not criminal, provided: It is not administered in anger; It does not result in health damage or visible injury.


can-teachers-legally-punish-students-for-their-betterment

Can teachers legally punish students for their betterment ?

A Historic Legal TransformationIn 2023, India undertook one of the most ambitious overhauls of its criminal justice system since independence. The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS), the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), and the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA) were enacted, replacing the colonial-era Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC), and the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (IEA), respectively.
This reform signals a departure from the legacy of British legal frameworks and promises a shift towards citizen-centric justice. Key goals include ensuring speedy trials, empowering victims, digitizing procedures, and strengthening national security.
II. Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023:
Redefining Substantive Criminal LawThe BNS contains 358 sections, a significant reduction from the 511 sections of the IPC. Outdated colonial terminology has been replaced with simplified and indigenous expressions. Notably:
Sedition Removed: Section 124A of the IPC, often criticized for curbing free speech, has been repealed. In its place, Clause 150 introduces the offence of acts endangering the sovereignty, unity, and integrity of India. This provision may face judicial scrutiny on grounds of vagueness.
Mob Lynching and Organized Crime: These offences, which were previously not distinctly recognized, are now clearly defined. Clauses 103 and 111–113 address mob violence, organized crime, and terrorism with enhanced punishments.
Community Service: For the first time, the law introduces community service as an alternative punishment for minor offences, promoting restorative justice.
Hit-and-Run Accidents: The punishment has been enhanced significantly. BNS now prescribes up to 10 years' imprisonment for drivers who cause fatal accidents and flee the scene (Clause 104).
Sexual Offences and Victim Rights: Provisions related to sexual offences have been redrafted for better clarity, including reference to digital sexual abuse. Importantly, Clause 193 codifies victim rights, including the right to legal assistance and to have their statements recorded promptly and sensitively.
III. Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023: 
Overhauling Criminal ProcedureThe BNSS expands procedural law to 531 sections, incorporating modern technology and timelines to ensure effective justice delivery. Key innovations include:
Digital FIR and E-FIR: Citizens can now file FIRs electronically, including using digital signatures. The law formally recognizes e-FIRs and Zero FIRs under Clause 173, promoting easier access to justice. Timeline for Charge Sheets: Unlike the CrPC, which had no fixed deadline, BNSS mandates filing of charge sheets within 90 days, extendable up to 180 days, ensuring time-bound investigation.


Salil kumar

Legal Cyfle

Opportunities

Company

Social

Miscellaneous

Resources